Print this page Decision Compensates State Workers Denied Benefits Under Retirement System
BOSTON MA - infoZine -
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced
recently that the final settlement of its class action age
discrimination lawsuit against the Commonwealth of Massachusetts will
result in well over one million dollars in benefits to former state
employees.
The EEOC entered a final stipulation on May 15, endorsed by the Court
on May 18, 2006, that recognized that all state, local, and municipal
employees who had been discriminated against in applying for accidental
disability retirements under the Massachusetts public retirement system
had been identified and paid the benefits that had been wrongfully
denied them. The EEOC had sued the state of Massachusetts, along with
its Public Employees Retirement Administration Commission and the
Massachusetts Teachers' Retirement Board, in 1999 on behalf of these
age discrimination victims (Case No. 99 CV 11233 RGS in U.S. District
Court for the District of Massachusetts).
The original settlement, which extended back to October 16, 1992, and
which was announced in August 2000, provided accidental disability
retirement pensions to all those otherwise eligible who were either
denied, or discouraged from applying for these pensions solely because
their ages exceeded Massachusetts's maximum age limitations. In
addition, the Commonwealth had agreed to pay double damages to all
those who qualified for relief under the settlement. The total amount
of the monetary relief was open-ended and was determined only after all
of the retirement applications were processed.
This process has already resulted in $1,266,956 being paid to 15
claimants. In the future, the claimants together will receive an
additional $165,176 every year, making the probable total settlement
amount several million dollars, depending on the lifespan of the
recipients.
The announcement brings to a close years of litigation in which the
EEOC sued Massachusetts repeatedly for its retirement system's
violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). Shortly
before this settlement was approved by U.S. District Judge Richard G.
Stearns of the District of Massachusetts in 2000, the Commonwealth
amended its retirement statute to delete those provisions that
discriminated on the basis of age.
Noting that the Supreme Court has cut off the right of individual
employees to sue states under the ADEA, EEOC New York Regional Attorney
Elizabeth Grossman said, "The scope of this settlement should put all
state employers on notice that the EEOC will continue to monitor
closely the states' compliance with the ADEA."
EEOC Senior Trial Attorney Mark Penzel added, "We would like to commend
the efforts of the Office of the Massachusetts Attorney General in
resolving this case promptly and fully, working with the legislature in
amending the statute, and cooperating fully during the administration
of the settlement process."
The EEOC is responsible for enforcing the nation's laws prohibiting
discrimination in employment based on race, color, sex (including
sexual harassment and pregnancy), religion, national origin, age,
disability, and retaliation. Further information about the Commission
is available on its web site at www.eeoc.gov.